Cultural accessible pedestrian ways. The case of Faro historic centre

  • Manuela Pires Rosa University of Algarve – Institute of Engineering
  • Isabel Landim Tavares Freelancer & Expert in Accessibility for All
  • Nuno Santos Loureiro University of Algarve
Keywords: Accessible Culture Routes, Accessible Pedestrian Ways, Social Inclusion, Social Sustainability

Abstract

In a historic city the existence of accessible pedestrian routes constitutes an essential feature to a true access to culture heritage, contributing for processes of social inclusion. It is necessary to create accessible pedestrian infrastructures network to hold a set of attributes that guarantee usability for all citizens. The creation and design of an accessible physical environment should be considered as a criterion of urban quality, which will make walking more pleasant not only for the elderly and people with disabilities but, also, for the entire resident population and tourists. In this case study it is ascertainable whether the physical characteristics of pedestrian infrastructures of cultural interest, located in the Historical Centre of Faro (Portugal), comply with the requirements of the National Law of Accessibility. There has, therefore, been created a methodology for evaluating the accessibility of pedestrian infrastructure through the construction of performance indicators. The analysis is achieved through a model of evaluation of the degree of conformity of the spaces, and presented, spatially, with appeal to a Geographical Information System, which is a tool to support the decision taking in the processes of urban rehabilitation, thus contributing to the choice of priority areas of intervention in the field of accessibility. The diagnosis confirms the existence of inaccessible pedestrian infrastructure and concludes the need to trigger processes of urban renovation.

Author Biography

Manuela Pires Rosa, University of Algarve – Institute of Engineering

Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being (CinTurs)

References

Aragall, F. & EuCAN members (2003). European concept for accessibility: technical assistance manual. Luxemburgo: EuCAN - European Concept for Accessibility Network.

Aashto (2004): Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official.

Beale, L., Matthews, H., Picton, P. & Briggs, D. (2000) MAGUS: Modeling Access with GIS in Urban Systems: An Application for Wheelchair Users in Northamptonshire. Proc. 6th ERCIM Workshop - User Interfaces for All. CD-ROM, Florence, Italy.

Council of Europe (2001): Resolution ResAP(2001)1: on the introduction of the principles of universal design into the curricula of all occupations working on the built environment. Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers.

Center for Universal Design (1997): The principles of universal design, Version 2.0. Raleigh: North Carolina State University - The Center for Universal Design. USA. By Connell, B. R.; Jones, M.; Mace, R.; Mueller, J.; Mullick, A.; Ostroff, E.; Sanford, J.; Steinfeld, E.; Story, M. & Vanderheiden, G. Available at: http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/ udprinciplestext.htm. Accessed on: March 28, 2018.

Chesney, D.A. & Axelson, P.W. (1996) Preliminary test method for the determination of surface firmness. IEEE Trans. on Rehabil. Engin., 4(3), 182-187.

Darcy, S., & Dickson, T. (2009). A Whole-of-Life Approach to Tourism: The Case for Accessible Tourism Experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 32-44.

Decreto-Lei nº. 163/2006 de 8 de Agosto (2006): Diário da República nº. 152/2006 - I Série. Ministério do Trabalho e da Solidariedade Social. fls. 5670 a 5689.

Evans, G. (2009). Accessibility, urban design and the whole journey environment. Built Environment, 35 (3), 366-385.

Ferreira, M. A. G. & Sanches, S.P. (2007). Proposal of a sidewalk accessibility index. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, v.1, n.1, 1–9.

INE (2012). Censos 2011. Resultados definitivos, Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.

Kockelman, K., Heard, L., Kweon, Y.-J. & Rioux, T.W. (2002). Sidewalk Cross-slope Design: Analysis of Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. Transportation Research Board, 1818, 108-118.

Paula, R. & Paula, F. (1993). Faro, Evolução Urbana e Património, Faro: Câmara Municipal de Faro.

Rodrigues, A., Rosa, M., & Rebelo, E. (2017). Cultural accessible tourism in Algarve region, case study. International Journal of Scientific Management and Tourism, 3(2), 459-482.

Teles, P., & Silva, P. R. (2010). Manual de Orientações Técnicas em matéria de acessibilidade e mobilidade no âmbito dos Planos Local e Municipal de Portimão. Câmara Municipal de Portimão.
UNWTO. (2011). Tourism Towards 2030/Global overview. Wold Tourism Organization, Spain, pp. 10-26.

Wennberg, H.; Hydén, C. & Ståhl, A. (2010). Barrier-free outdoor environments: Older peoples' perceptions before and after implementation of legislative directives. Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), 464-474.

World Tourism Organization (2015). Affiliate Members Global Reports, Volume twelve – Cultural Routes and Itineraries. Madrid: UNWTO.
Published
2020-04-01
How to Cite
Pires Rosa, M., Landim Tavares, I., & Santos Loureiro, N. (2020, April 1). Cultural accessible pedestrian ways. The case of Faro historic centre. Journal of Tourism and Heritage Research, 3(2), 75-95. Retrieved from http://www.jthr.es/index.php/journal/article/view/162